Presumably by now, unless she lives under a rock on the moon, the modern mother has seen the cover of this week's Time Magazine. And yet, at this point dear savvy, mannerly readers, what can one say? Congratulations Time Magazine you've won the week. Victory is yours. The LA Times got it right on Friday when it wrote "Time Magazine breastfeeding cover: A shocking 'stroke of genius.'" Brilliant. Just when we all thought the ennui was complete. What could possibly be left to say on the subject of motherhood? Tiger, French, Attached, Detached, Skinned Knee - we had heard it all. But somehow the sight of an attractive 26 year-old model (as in runway) mother nursing her three year-old son who is standing on a chair, managed to get everyone in a lather once more.
Or did it? Aside from a male friend who got a big laugh when he asked at dinner on Friday "Do you think that's really her kid?" everyone else we know has chalked it up to fringe believers lacking in decorum and a magazine looking for newsstand revenue. After all, how many average mothers have the luxury of making this choice in the first place? As we checked in with some of our favorite mainstream media parenting sites (Motherload, Huffington Post, The Juggle) none of these writers really had anything very heated to say about the whole thing either. Like most moderate mothers these writers seemed tired of the whole debate and probably needed to do something else like get some sleep, go to work, make dinner or write about someone with a real problem. Because, let's face it, having the luxury to choose whether you can make your bed and person completely available to a child for five years is a pretty high-class problem to have.
I would like to go on the record as saying I believe that the mothers in Time Magazine are exploiting their children for the sake of their own agenda and I feel sorry for those children that they will grow up with this notoriety.
If you are looking for a nice dose of sanity try this take on the whole silliness by Boston writer Kara Baskin.
Thanks a lot Time Magazine.
by
EBB
on
Monday, May 14, 2012
2
comments
|
Labels:
Bringing Up Bebe,
co-sleeping,
do nothing,
hoochie mama,
hyper-parenting,
ivy league,
nudity,
one-upmanship,
sleep,
Tiger Mother
|
Nudity
by
EHP
on
Monday, November 23, 2009
Even the most well mannered young children may have a “naked phase” where they shed clothes like a molting bird and run free and unfettered around the house and yard. This is fine in many families, though the well mannered modern mother should consider a clothing requirement for mealtimes, guests who might feel uncomfortable with the child’s nudity (grandparents come to mind), and the arrival of the plumber, contractor, or electrician. This phase should not be encouraged in children over 6 years-old.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
